In the Eye of the Beholder

There's a reason for the wink...
Ah, the fine line between anatomy and, well, anatomy. Church-goers are incensed by a rather questionable depiction of the Savior, although not everyone agrees.
Sphere: Related ContentSeeton said the portion of the crucifix in question is meant to be Jesus’ abdomen “showing distension” — not a penis.
Seeton said, “I’ve had people who have vocally said that that’s what they see there. I’ve had people who have been just as vocal who said that’s not what they’re seeing there.”
![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://www.tinyminds.net/images/valid-rss.png)





Not quite sure about the headline there, Charlotte.
OK, that’s better. We don’t want to offend anyone, well, not gratuitously.
I think its interesting how there are so many disputes about how Jesus should look and how he shouldn’t.
If you have to question whether it’s a penis or not, it’s really not, even if it is.